Month: August 2022

Rosie DiManno: Unfair lockdown rules, creative compliance (what a mess)

Balls of brass, The Bay.

For many months, I’ve been dropping by Pusateri’s, in the upscale Sak’s Food Hall in the basement of The Bay’s flagship emporium at Yonge and Queen, wondering when it might re-open. The coming-soon signs kept changing, most recently announcing Pusateri’s would be back in 2021.

They jumped the gun by 53 days. If only, following significant shaming, fleetingly – open Monday, the first full day of Toronto’s lockdown 2.0, closed by Tuesday. Ditto the entire department store.

I did think it odd, on the weekend, buying a pile of stuff at The Bay’s children’s department, when the clerk assured me not to worry, staff had just been told the store wouldn’t be shuttering as most of the city zippered up again. “I’m not sure how but The Bay has received permission to stay open.’’

No they didn’t, it appears.

Such an audacious workaround – runaround – of the reimposed rules nobody likes but to which most are adhering: Exploiting the narrow food vending component – groceries are essential – to keep the cash-registers cha-chinging for all the rest of The Bay’s merchandise. Dancing on the head of a tin of caviar.

The spin-bumff to my colleague claimed the company believed it was in compliance with the lockdown fiat Premier Doug Ford has triggered anew because of Pusateri’s, a feature only of the downtown location, which is why the chain’s other stories in Toronto and Peel had shut its doors.

As per the email sent to Rubin: “We understood this to be in line with the province’s direction, however we have now made the decision to close our Queen Street store (Tuesday).’’

Yeah, pull the other one.

To emphasize: While the rest of the department store had been functional since June, the Food Hall remained sealed up tight, for reasons never explained. But clearly Pusateri’s wasn’t considered essential for The Bay’s bottom line. And this is a retailer – the Hudson’s Bay Company – in a whole heap ‘o fiscal distress.

On Sunday, before the lockdown came into effect in Toronto and Peel, the two hot spots in Ontario, shoppers arriving at The Bay location at Centerpoint Mall, Yonge and Steeles, were confronted with a posted notice from the landlord saying the store’s lease had been terminated. The company has been rent delinquent at other locations across the country. Most recently, a Quebec judge ordered Hudson’s Bay to pay rent at several department stores in that province. A store has also reportedly been shuttered in B.C., for nonpayment of rent.

An Ontario judge has ordered the company to pay half the outstanding rent at its Richmond Hill location to avert eviction.

But suddenly Pusateri’s was the critical link at Yonge and Queen, even though most of the shelves were empty —no fresh produce, nothing in the dairy fridge, prepared foods section closed. Stock some gourmet items, fancy pasta and oils, however, and Bob’s your uncle.

Sell vittles and all the merchandise is your oyster.

Not so slick and now scuttled.

“I had literally 500 members in the GTA and Peel reach out to say, if they started to sell apples and bags of chips, can they become an essential service provider and therefore skirt the rules?’’ snorts Dan Kelly, president of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB). “Many of them are asking tongue-in-cheek, but not really.

“That’s pretty brazen, to make the case that you’re an essential service because you’re got a tiny food department in your store. It would be like Winners claiming they’re an essential service because they sell boxes of chocolates.

“If they were successful, I’d say mazel tov, every small retailer would be able to do the same thing, but on a much smaller basis.’’

Much of the public might have a soft spot for The Bay because of its iconic status as a Canadian institution. Except the Hudson’s Bay Company has been American-owned since 2006.

One might even have a tad of admiration for the company’s chutzpah, finagling the regs. But did they think nobody would notice and competitors wouldn’t complain? Whinges that were relayed to a clearly unaware Ford on Monday, who merely observed it was “unfair’’ and big box stores shouldn’t circumvent the rules while so many small businesses have been forced to roll down the awning.

Well, that’s the crux of the thing, isn’t it? The province’s lockdown mandate for Toronto and Peel – adamantly advanced by the public health care sector, infectious disease experts, their acolytes in the media and armchair epidemiological modellers, none of whom are facing a livelihood crisis – is clear as mud, most particularly in its exclusion of big box stores from limitations.

A patron can’t shop for a novel at an independent book store but can do so at, say, Costco, or any Shopper’s Drug Mart with a rack of paperback bestsellers. Can’t in-person shop for Christmas gifts at Roots or Sephora but all the schmutta and tat you want from Walmarts is okey-doke.

We are clearly not all in this together and, yet again, the brunt of the burden, the economic fallout, has dropped on the heads of small business owners.

As of two months ago, those nostalgic freedom-flexing days of late summer, days of late summer, Kelly’s organization had projected that an average of 160,000 small businesses – one in seven approximately — would permanently close as a result of coronavirus restrictions. If not lives lost, very much livelihoods lost. That figure doesn’t include “zombie stores” that have hung out a closed sign in the desperate hope, fading, of some day reopening.

On the subject of The Bay’s sly gambit, Kelly says: “I find on one level hard to criticize them because every retailer is in a fight for their life. These restrictions, literally the government has signed their death warrants. And I understand why they’re pushing back against the actual death of thousands of Ontarians. At the same time, there’s been a huge shift since the spring lockdowns.”

Much as CFIB members grumbled about the lockdowns in March, they understand that immediate and blunt action was necessary to protect society, even if poorly thought out and clumsily imposed. But provincial governments have had some six months to get it right the second time around, which every authority warned would be coming in the second wave of the coronavirus.

“What’s different is that we know an awful lot more about COVID-19,” says Kelly. “We know how it’s spread. Businesses have taken huge numbers of precautions to protect their customers and their staff. I’m not for a second suggesting that there’s no risk in a small retailer. But independent businesses are being shut down not because the business activity is more risky than other activities, but to send a message to the public. That’s what’s really upset the small business community so much. And then on top of that to have these restrictions put in place with such an arbitrary saw-off.”

What is the point of shutting down a small business that might have a handful of customers on the premises at the same time and essentially all that traffic, from many such business, to the so-called big box stores, resulting in crowds as thick as those in supermarkets? “It’s actually making COVID exposure worse by pushing all that traffic to a handful of big box stores,” Kelly argues.

Filling their carts with essentials and non-essentials. Because they can.

In Manitoba, at least, the unfair lockdown order has been somewhat addressed by a new rule, announced last Friday, that prevents large retailers – those permitted to remain open, selling essential goods in-store, from selling any non-essential goods, other than online or via curbside service.

This isn’t quantum physics.

“It’s a lot easier to buy from Costco or delivered by Amazon than trudging down and picking it up outside the store,” says Kelly. Especially when there’s no in-store experience – the browsing, the person-to-person consulting – that draws shoppers to smaller shops.

It shouldn’t be so hard to find, as Kelly suggests, a better saw-off for these deeply threatened independent businesses and the staff they employ. A reasonable strategy would be, say, permitting three customers in-store at a time, with three staffers. “It would allow at least a heartbeat of economic activity for the small guys and take some of the pressure off the big guys.”

Pressure? In the second-quarter for 2020, Walmart’s sales shot up by 13.9 per cent over the previous quarter. Globally, Amazon has enjoyed record-breaking sales of $4.6 billion in 19 countries, including Canada.

Meanwhile, all that inventory ordered by small businesses for the make-or-break Christmas spend-a-thon is just sitting there for at least another 25 days of lockdown.

The disease is real, unrelenting and doesn’t give a rat’s ass about red ink splashed across bookkeeping records.

But government should offer a better economic solution than slam-bam-thank-you-scram.

Rosie DiManno is a Toronto-based columnist covering sports and current affairs for the Star. Follow her on Twitter:

Shopping for medical grade masks? Here’s how to avoid the counterfeit trap

Most Canadian consumers have fallen prey to those who hawk knockoff or counterfeit goods. Fortunately, the repercussions of buying a fake Rolex are minor.

Personal protective equipment (PPE) and respirators are another story, and since demand for these items spiked at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, dubious suppliers have taken advantage of scarcity and consumers’ desperation by selling counterfeit versions. Consumers unfamiliar with the world of medical device regulation can be easy prey.

“I think for Canadians, and for consumers around the world, we haven’t had to think about medical devices and PPE,” said Carmen Francis, a lawyer who specializes in international trade law with Toronto-based McCarthy Tétrault LLP, “so there’s a general lack of familiarity with the spectrum of regulations.”

Ontarians are encouraged by the provincial and federal governments to use non-medical masks in public indoor spaces and when physical distancing is hard to achieve, but for those facing situations where N95 masks are recommended, using an authentic product could mean the difference between health and sickness, or worse.

Here is some advice for avoiding counterfeit N95 and KN95 masks.

Know what you’re looking for

N95 masks filter out at least 95 per cent of airborne particles; that’s where the “95” comes from. KN95 filters are supposed to do the same. The difference is that while N95 filters are the U.S. and Canadian standard for respirator masks, KN95 are the Chinese standard.

All legitimate N95 masks — and some counterfeit ones — will bear the stamp of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). KN95 masks do not.

“PPE” Personal protective equipment, including N95 masks and latex gloves, have been in high demand since the pandemic was declared. – Richard Lautens/Torstar file photo

While Health Canada has approved KN95 masks for use as respirators here, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns they may not be as effective as N95 masks because most use an ear loop design that makes it harder to achieve a proper fit required for a mask to be effective than the headband design used by authentic N95 masks.

Look for supplier red flags

When shopping for a mask online, Francis said for legal reasons, consumers should stick to dealing with authorized third-party suppliers, rather than trying to import masks directly from an overseas manufacturer.

“As a consumer it’s a licensed activity, importing medical devices,” she said.

Shopping for masks in an online marketplace such as eBay or Amazon can work, Francis said, but presents a greater risk of fraud.

In June, 3M corporation filed a lawsuit against a third-party Amazon seller called KMJ Trading for allegedly selling marked-up, counterfeit N95 masks.

Francis said consumers shopping for masks in an online marketplace should look at the seller’s reviews and sale history to look for red flags and establish how long they’ve been selling PPE and respirators for.

“If they’ve only been selling masks for a couple months or had no prior history selling PPE before the pandemic that is a bit of a red flag,” she said, adding that consumers should buy from sellers who were squarely situated within the PPE market before the onset of the pandemic. She also advised against purchasing PPE and respirators from suppliers who also sell goods that are not at all related to PPE.

Visually inspect masks

Whether shopping for masks online or in person, consumers should do their best to look for signs of authenticity — or fraudulence — on masks and packaging before making a purchase.

Francis said one of the first things to look for on an N95 mask is the NIOSH logo.

“If the packaging bears NIOSH approval markings that’s a helpful sign,” she said. “We have seen instances where counterfeit goods are also using those same NIOSH claims, so you have to do some digging beyond that.”

Health Canada says genuine N95 respirators should also contain a testing and certification (TC) approval number, which is set by NIOSH, a model number and the name of the manufacturer. The government agency advises consumers to look at product markings such as the name of the manufacturer for obvious signs the product is counterfeit, such as spelling mistakes.

If a mask or mask packing is also stamped with a medical device establishment number (MDEL) or a licence number, you should be able to search for it in a NIOSH or Health Canada database to confirm that the product is genuine.

Search official databases

Because some fraudulent suppliers have been accused of selling counterfeit masks with falsified approval markings, like the NIOSH stamp of approval, Francis said consumers should ensure respirators are the real deal by cross referencing them with official databases in Canada and the U.S.

“There are some diligence steps we would recommend,” she said. “The U.S. NIOSH does maintain a database … likewise Health Canada maintains a daily list of authorized medical devices that can be used for COVID-approved purposes.”

Consumers can search for approved N95 and KN95 masks in Health Canada’s using the manufacturer name.

Health Canada also keeps a because they are either counterfeit or do not meet the 95 per cent filtration rate requirement.

Although KN95 and other internationally equivalent masks are not approved by NIOSH and won’t bear a NIOSH stamp, the U.S. National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) has assessed the filtration rates of nearly 400 KN95 masks.

You can see which masks achieved the minimum 95 per cent filtration rate and which didn’t on the . The same page also includes a table of KN95 masks manufacturers that are known to have been counterfeited.