Category: ythytbu

‘Don’t be such a snowflake’: Integrity commissioner says Midland councillor disrespected, bullied colleagues

Coun. Bill Gordon is the subject of another investigation by the integrity commissioner.

In a by Principles Integrity, he was found to have disrespected, bullied and harassed fellow councillors and staff. He was also accused of allegedly exerting undue influence to pressure a local developer.

Councillors Jonathan Main and Jim Downer and Deputy Mayor Mike Ross all filed complaints with the integrity commissioner. 

“We saw a pattern of a lack of decorum in social-media postings, emails to senior staff and council communications,” said Main. “There were a series of incidents which were alarming, and that’s really why we put forward a complaint. Clearly, the code of conduct wasn’t being followed.”

In , Gordon was reprimanded for a pattern of rude, aggressive and bullying behaviour that included offensive language on social media.

The latest incident is addressed in a report that will be presented to council Dec. 9.

Several exchanges between Main and Gordon are highlighted in the document. In one instance, Gordon sent an email to Main that stated, “I have little to no personal respect for many of you or a couple of our senior team. I come by that honestly and have the bills to prove it. I have to work with you and have managed to keep most of my contempt for many of you at bay.”

According to the report, Gordon also sent Main a direct message over Facebook in which he stated: “Don’t be such a snowflake.”

Principles Integrity found these comments and behaviour constitute harassment, stating “no workplace could condone such explicit disrespectful treatment among co-workers.”

In mid-July, council was made aware of complaints by residents on Taylor Drive. Staff notified council they were working on a remedy. A month later, the developer advised the town that, after having a discussion with Gordon, it would address the complaints “to avoid a motion at the next council meeting.”

The integrity commissioner did not find Gordon guilty of pressuring the developer, but called the incident “inappropriate interference” and a violation of the code of conduct.

In , Gordon said he doesn’t dispute the facts. However, he feels his fellow councillors should have approached him first. 

“(It) is both offensive and abusive to weaponize the Code of Conduct to advance personal grievances against one another,” he wrote. “We are adults and communications, even when disagreeing, is how we should solve our differences — rather than turning to legal process.”

Gordon has committed to continuing to learn from his “mistakes, missteps and errors” while “acting in good faith” as an elected representative.

“I cannot commit to never offending someone,” he wrote. “(If) someone is determined to look for ways to be offended by someone, they are almost certain to find them.”

Main stressed the complaints were not personal. 

“At the end of the day, what council really wants is for everyone to adhere to the code of conduct — to keep a respectful, professional workplace,” he said.

Principles Integrity has recommended that Gordon be formally reprimanded.

City said shelters were all physically distanced despite knowing they weren’t, new court documents claim

When Toronto reported in June that it had fully complied with physical distancing requirements in its shelter system, there were still 32 beds at seven sites that weren’t yet adhering to distancing standards, new documents in an ongoing lawsuit reveal — something a coalition of homeless service providers and human rights advocates allege that senior city managers knew.

“Although it was under no requirement to do so by a particular point in time, for its own reasons, the City determined to assert that it had achieved compliance with Physical Distancing Standards on June 15, 2020, despite actual knowledge that it had not in fact done so,” it claims.

Lawyer Jessica Orkin, who represents the coalition, said the new documents – which include emails between city staff and others on June 15 – present a “very clear paper trail” of the city knowing it wasn’t in compliance, but deciding to claim it anyway.

The coalition is asking the court to find that the city hadn’t reached compliance by June 15 — and still hasn’t.

The city disputes that claim, though it confirmed in documents filed Tuesday that 32 beds at seven sites were not properly distanced when it claimed full system compliance on June 15.

The city argues that the beds represent just 0.45 per cent of the shelter system, and that their impact was negligible. The last of those beds were taken out of the system by Sept. 9, the city says.

The lawsuit also includes disputes over the definition of appropriate spacing and who the city is obligated to shelter.

A hearing has been scheduled for Thursday.

The suit was initially filed by the coalition earlier in the pandemic. It accused the city of failing to provide safe living conditions in its shelters, respites and drop-in facilities.

A settlement was reached in May, in which the city agreed to make best efforts to ensure two metres between all beds, stop using bunk beds, and ensure that beds were available for anyone receiving support services from the system since March 11, .

But the coalition relaunched its case in July – shortly after the city said it reached full compliance.

In the newly filed documents, the city says the decision to assert achievement on June15 was made by Gordon Tanner, the city’s homeless initiatives and prevention services director, and was based on its interpretation of the settlement and the commitment to use “best efforts” to achieve distancing — understanding that “fine tuning and adjustments would continue.”

Reaching that milestone meant the city no longer had to issue weekly progress reports, and could stop issuing monthly updates after two months.

The coalition has filed with the court emails from the day the final weekly report was sent that is says are evidence senior managers knew the city hadn’t reached full compliance. The city says the emails merely demonstrate a final push to get there.

“I know everyone wants this to disappear, but I feel like we are pushing a bit too hard to finalize today and it could leave us vulnerable,” Brad Boucher, operations and support services manager, wrote to several other city staff members at 7:37 a.m. on June 15, the documents show.

Boucher wrote that his team hadn’t begun “any of the work” outlined in an earlier email from the director of service planning and integrity, “so we will definitely be rushed to complete.”

An email from a little more than an hour later from Tanner says that he’d assured Mary-Anne Bedard, general manager of SSHA, that the report that day would be their last weekly dispatch.

“Please do what you can to have the team complete their assigned work today. Our (quality assurance) visits will continue as we move forward in the spirit of continuous improvement,” Tanner wrote back to Boucher and several others on the email chain.

Other emails in the new filings raised concern with specific sites, and show Boucher noting that a number of providers either used a six-foot measurement instead of the mandated two metres – a difference of roughly half a foot – “or admitted they never measured at all.”

After a conference call between Tanner and other city staff members around 5:30 p.m. that day, the final weekly report was sent to the coalition’s legal team by the city’s counsel at 9:49 p.m.

The city, in its new filing, said it was “evident” that the significance of the commitment made in the May settlement was not communicated to staff. But the city argues that the documents filed don’t support the allegation that staff were deliberately hiding sites that weren’t yet compliant.

The coalition, meanwhile, is asking the court for “additional protections” to ensure the sufficiency of the city’s efforts, and the reliability of the information it provides.

Since COVID-19 struck, the costs to operate a shelter bed have doubled in Toronto due largely to reductions in capacity, and the city says roughly a third of shelters .

Victoria Gibson is a Toronto-based reporter for the Star covering affordable housing. Her reporting is funded by the Canadian government through its Local Journalism Initiative. Reach her via email:

OPP charge driver alleged to have damaged traffic light in Midland

A 21-year-old Tiny Township driver faces six charges in connection with a collision that took out a Yonge Street traffic light on Oct. 24.

Southern Georgian Bay OPP were called to the intersection at Fourth and Yonge Streets around 2:15 p.m., after a trailer being pulled by a pickup truck flipped over and took out a traffic light. 

The tandem-axle trailer, loaded with machinery, rolled over and struck the traffic light post, knocking it to the ground. A small amount of diesel fuel was spilled during the incident and the road was blocked off for several hours.

On Oct. 30, police announced that the driver of the pickup truck would face six charges. These charges include: careless driving, driving a commercial vehicle with an improper licence, driving a vehicle with a defective breaking system, pulling a trailer with no permit, failing to operate a commercial vehicle within the permitted weight, and failure to surrender an insurance card.

According to Andy Campbell, executive director of environment and infrastructure for the Town of Midland, the damaged traffic light is going to cost about $8,000 to repair. The town will bear the cost of fixing the light, but could be reimbursed by its insurance company.

Rosie DiManno: Growing up is a torment at the best of times, never mind in times like these

Coming of age in the epoch of the coronavirus is a bummer.

Just when young adults are starting to spread their wings, exploring independence, punching through the parental bubble wrap, they’ve been stuffed back into infantilizing stasis.

The sheer fun of salad days has been smothered by a pandemic. When they do venture out in youth packs, cue the lectures and shaming. Because that’s always worked so well, yes?

Hard to be a rebel without a cause — the essence of angsty young adulthood — when you’re fingered for causing community contamination, bringing COVID-19 into the household, knocking off your grandparents. As London, Ont., Mayor Ed Holder berated last month, amidst positive case counts that climbed to levels not seen since the spring, scores linked to off-campus partying by Western University students: “You are going to kill someone.”

And turn down that godawful music while you’re at it.

No graduation ceremonies. No proms. No campus activities. No concerts. No moshing. No hangin’ out — except maybe at the mall, idly. Which fortunately is at least one popular time-waster not yanked back to forbidden in Ontario hot spot municipalities. Kingston has approved new fines for anyone hosting off-campus house parties, Queen’s University even threatening to expel students who do so.

Browbeating does not change behaviour.

“There are so many milestones that we have lost, like graduation,” says Em Hayes, a youth engagement facilitator at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health who is pursuing a masters in teaching. “Going back to school has been very challenging. I’m exhausted talking to a computer screen all day. I miss my community although most of us are also finding new ways to create communities.

“You don’t realize how much it meant to be in the physical presence of others until it was taken away.’’

Little wonder that mental health — anxiety segueing to depression — is cause for acute concern among pulse-takers of the youthful demographic in Canada.

“The pandemic and its restrictions are uniquely impacting young people because it impacts their developmental milestones and tasks right now,” says Joanna Henderson, associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, who is extensively involved with mental health initiatives for children and youth at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. “It doesn’t take long as adults to forget what it was like to be 16 or 18 or 20.”

Growing up is a torment at the best of times. These are the worst of times.

“They’re wired to be engaging socially, to be moving towards autonomy, to be learning, to be securing employment,” Henderson points out. “All of those things are being impacted by the pandemic and their restrictions. We have young people who are living by themselves, completely alone, and it may be the first time that they’ve moved out on their own. So, extremely difficult circumstances to cope with. And we have other young people who are in very close multi-generational homes in small dwellings who are experiencing tremendous economic stress.’’

But see a photo on social media of teenagers enjoying a bush party and BOOM — public health officials, politicians and online nags go berserk. How selfish. Of course they’re selfish. Show me a young person who isn’t self-absorbed. Traditionally, that’s why we cut them slack — because they’re not yet mature and conscientious.

Data shows more people in their 20s have tested positive for COVID-19 than any other age group. As of Oct. 16, 18.5 per cent of positive cases related to people aged 20 to 29 across Canada, 11.6 per cent among those 19 and under. The upside, doubtless due to their prevailing good medical health, is that they account for just 3.1 per cent of hospitalizations, the second lowest age bracket.

“My observation is there’s a focus on the 18-35 year old age range because we’re seeing increased rates there,” Henderson continues. “That is sometimes expressed in judgmental ways and I have concerns about that because the places that opened up during Stage 3 were places where young people are commonly employed and residences in universities, places of predominantly young people.”

Young people who, according to various studies and polls, are experiencing anxiety and depression, as high as a 20 per cent increase in that cohort.

“We haven’t given as much guidance as we need to on how to make those complex weighing of different places, how to respect the fact that we have young people out there kind of on the front line of our economy reopening,” says Henderson. “Recreation and partying is part of the story but certainly not the whole story. It’s easy to say stay six feet apart and wear a mask. But in actuality, we have pretty conflicting messages circulating right now about what’s important in our communities, in our economy, and how we’re expecting all people, including young people, to move forward.”

What Hayes describes as “the vagueness of the rules that are put out there.”

Henderson: “These are moments of interactions and transactions that are happening. It’s really incumbent on decision-makers and adults to communicate clearly and realistically if we actually want our messaging to resonate with young people.”

Considering that half the world’s population is younger than 30, this demographic has hardly any say-so in how COVID-19 is being targeted and the extent to which for-the-good-of-everybody restrictions are screwing up their lives. There is, for example, no youth voice at the “experts” table that Premier Doug Ford is all the time citing. There isn’t even a young people’s table, as is common at those Thanksgiving gatherings we harangued into not having last weekend.

“Young people need to be at the table in these conversations because they’re experts in their own lives,” says Henderson. “Meaningfully at the table, not in a tokenistic way, where they can share their expertise.”

The tenor of the demographic was reflected in the results of a survey led by Henderson in her capacity as executive director of Youth Wellness Hubs Ontario, a government-funded initiative to transform youth mental health services in the province. The one-stop-shop model has been implemented in 10 communities across Ontario thus far, though virtually because of the pandemic. The cross-sectional survey was conducted with 622 youth participants, which allowed for open-ended answers, included both young people who’ve already connected with mental health services and those who hadn’t.

The result revealed a “statistically significant” deterioration of mental health across the clinical and community samples — 68 per cent of youth in the clinical sample and 39.9 per cent in the community sample met screening criteria for an “internalizing disorder.” Perhaps surprisingly, substance use had actually declined in both cohorts since the pandemic struck (as of May data), although 23.2 per cent of youth (clinical) and 3.0 (community) could be described as having a substance use disorder.

As the survey concluded: “Among youth with histories of mental health concerns, the pandemic context poses a significant risk for exacerbation of need. In addition, youth may experience the onset of new difficulties.”

These are the years, from teens to mid-20s, when mental health issues often manifest themselves.

What’s most impressed Henderson, however, are the coping mechanisms that young adults are seizing upon to mentally and emotionally survive the pandemic, without scars.

All kinds of different strategies, from journaling, to engaging with art, to meditation, to exercise, to gardening and, of course, connecting on virtual platforms such as Instagram, including livestreamed events.

One Hub community, in a particularly economically disadvantaged area, collectively secured food donations, created an online cooking course — teaching each other — and made food baskets for distribution.

“That’s not what we would conventionally think of as mental health services. However, it was very enriching for young people’s mental health in the context of skill-building, the sense of being engaged in a productive activity, supporting their families and connecting with the community.”

There was, in fact, a subset of the young adult community surveyed that reported improved mental health during the lockdown. “People talked about the stress of being so busy, having that alleviated. We heard about the relief from school-specific stressors, varying forms of, ‘I didn’t realize how stressful my life was until I’ve been forced to take a break.’”

Many also reconnected more deeply with families. Prior to the pandemic, how many teens really wanted to hang out with mom and dad?

Occasional folly notwithstanding — young people throughout history view themselves as indestructible, no matter the safety warnings drummed into their skulls — they get it, they get COVID-19, they get masking and physical distancing. But the coronavirus has robbed them of so much in their waning days of innocence.

Says Em Hayes: “Youth understand the gravity of the situation.”

Rosie DiManno is a Toronto-based columnist covering sports and current affairs for the Star. Follow her on Twitter:

‘Largest development in the city’s history’: Four-tower SmartCentres project on Barrie’s waterfront clears major hurdle

A proposal that would reshape the City of Barrie’s waterfront skyline is about to take a giant leap toward reality.

On Nov. 30, the municipality’s planning committee approved zoning bylaw and official plan amendments for a large mixed-use project on the 3.5-hectare lot at . SmartCentres has pitched four buildings ranging in height from 25 to 46 storeys.

This decision needs to be ratified by council next week. However, approvals of this nature are generally seen as a significant step on the long road to construction.

“The approval of the applications would permit the future development of four towers for residential rental apartments, a hotel, ground floor commercial uses, a parking garage, open space and preservation of environmental lands,” development services director Michelle Banfield said in a report. “Although there are no formally recognized affordable units identified for this site, this project may assist with overall affordability of rental housing by adding a substantial number of units to the available market.”

This project would generate about $4.56 million in building permit application and $9.64 million in cash-in-lieu of parkland fees for the city.

About 1,700 residential units, 3,500 square metres of ground-floor commercial space and 145 hotel rooms would be built. Public corridors would also link to existing natural features, such as the Bunker’s Creek eco-park and Kempenfelt Bay.

This site is between Bradford and Lakeshore Drive, near the city’s waterfront.

“I recognize not everyone is happy with the proposal,” Coun. Keenan Aylwin said, noting the city has to meet provincially-mandated growth targets. “Change is difficult. The reality is Barrie is changing and growing whether we like it or not. A substantial amount of that growth will be taking place in our downtown and waterfront.”

Residents have, in the past, expressed a number of concerns with the proposal, including building height and density, shadowing, light pollution, soil stability and increased traffic in the area.

“While the height is significant in terms of existing development, staff do not consider the height requested by this proposal to be out of character in an urban centre,” Banfield said.

Some Barrie councillors had hoped there would be interest from SmartCentres in , as a potential alternative to the proposed $50-million reconstruction of the nearby W.A. Fisher auditorium into a large theatre and event facility.

However, that thought was shot down earlier this month.

“A full-sized conference centre’s not in the cards for SmartCentres, both for parking and development reasons,” Mayor Jeff Lehman said two weeks ago.

The property was once owned by , which also had control of the nearby Collier Centre. Fortress bought the Harmony Village land in November 2016. Initial plans had included six residential towers, townhouses and ground-floor retail.

However, Fortress ran into legal issues in recent years, mostly related to its syndicated mortgage investors.

“This is the largest development in the city’s history,” Lehman said Monday night. “There is a significant portion of our population who have real concerns with this height. This may not be popular; that may not necessarily make it wrong.”