Tag: 上海千花芳桑拿论坛

Bruce Arthur: With COVID-19, pushing to reopen too soon is a loser’s bargain

I hope Doug Ford misspoke. It happens, when you hold a daily press conference for seven months. Because otherwise, on Friday, the premier may have chosen a path.

“Based on the latest evidence, based on what I am seeing in the modelling, I have asked our public health experts to come back next with a plan to begin to ease restrictions in a way that will safely allow businesses to start opening back up after the 28-day period is over,” said Ford, on the hot spots of Toronto, Ottawa and Peel, which have been in Stage 2 restrictions since Oct. 9. “I want the health officials to come up with a plan that lets business operate safely, because we don’t know how long this virus will be with us, but my friends, what we do know is together, we’re going to get through this.”

The engine light blinked yellow on that statement, and maybe red. Of course we want to reopen safely. Everyone wants that.

But the definition of safely is the issue. On Wednesday Ford said “we see the curve going down, which is great news,” but Thursday the government’s public health presentation said the rate of case increases had merely slowed, and that Ontario would only exceed ICU capacity in one of three scenarios, having avoided the worst case.

How could that spur talk of reopening? Twice Friday, Ford was asked what about the data indicated reopening would be warranted; twice, he dodged the question. He kept comparing Ontario to the rest of the world, which when you are jammed between Quebec, Canada’s-worst pandemic, Manitoba’s emerging disaster, and the tragic grease fire of the United States, offers many low bars. Ford was asked, if his much-maligned science and public health advisers come back and say it’s a bad idea — and only Ottawa has shown a per-capita case drop in the last three weeks, and remains high — will he follow their advice?

“Well, anything’s possible,” said Ford. “Again, I’m going to rely on the data and the advice from the health team, but this can’t go on indefinitely. You know, again, one doesn’t work without the other. Without your health, you don’t have the economy. And if the economy goes south, then there’s a lot of people with health issues, mental health, depression, addiction. So there’s a happy balance. So we’ll find that happy balance with our health team.”

Except the pandemic isn’t a balance beam so much as it’s a sequence: public health, then the economy. Ford moved quickly enough on widespread restrictions in the spring, and that was laudable. He has been and to implement in the fall.

Saying we don’t know how long the virus will be with us, and that this can’t go on indefinitely — that points to a desire to open up and hope the hospitals can handle it, and with that is a loser’s bargain. Does Ford want to emulate Alberta, which has stuck with many voluntary restrictions as their cases rise, or Manitoba, which waited too long to act and is now in crisis? This sounds like the talk of a province that didn’t invest enough in public health or epidemic response — whose crashed, and where contact tracing has been half-abandoned in Toronto and Ottawa, among other places feeling the strain.

“He’s right; we don’t know how long it’ll be with us,” says Dr. Andrew Morris, a professor of infectious diseases at the University of Toronto, and the medical director of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at Sinai-University Health Network. “But this is why we need an open public discussion about strategy.

“It is possible to move on without controlling COVID? That has to be the first discussion. Is it possible? Is there an example anywhere in the world right now of any country that has been able to do this? Everyone’s talked about Sweden, and now it’s been totally disproven as an approach. So is there another country anywhere in the world where you can just live with this? And the answer is no.

“What’s our strategy? We don’t have a strategy.”

“I think if we’re doing magnificently in two weeks, then try it, see how it goes,” says Dr. David Fisman, an epidemiologist at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health. “If it’s a disaster, reverse it. (But) we know what direction that would go, and the downside risk there is you would shut the bars and restaurants after things exploded, as they did in the (United Kingdom) after their Dine Out campaign, and you would potentially also wreck the schools, and wreck the wider economy in the process. So I think it’s a pretty big gamble.”

Fisman noted the locally uninformed kerfuffle over data showing few bars and restaurants had been linked to outbreaks in Peel or Ottawa, but points out that 10 per cent of cases are outbreaks, 40 per cent of cases have a link to some other case, and 50 per cent have no known epidemiological link at all, and that last number is going up. He also notes that the Centers for Disease Control found that unlinked cases are three to four times more likely to have visited a bar, restaurant, or coffee house, or similar.

And finally, Fisman notes Ontario is not immune from what we know about how the virus is spread. Thursday the province’s own medical advisers said the danger of non-essential indoor spaces is well established. And Friday the Star reported an outbreak at Ford’s own constituency office, which he said was the result of visitors coming indoors.

“I was a huge believer in the hammer and the dance,” says Morris, referring to the now-famous description of a pattern of lockdowns and reopenings published earlier this year. “And it’s all bulls—. It’s total bulls—. Nobody’s been able to do it. They thought they could do it, but they can’t. Maybe the Danish, but in September and October they’ve increased restrictions to control things. But no country has the exquisite infrastructure to be able to dance, so instead, the only strategy that seems to work is you keep it as close to zero as possible.”

Ontario certainly lacks the tools to dance, and the footwork along with it. So I hope Doug Ford just got impatient, and was momentarily overcome by his heartfelt devotion to small businesses, about which he speaks more empathetically than about any other part of the pandemic. Because the way he spoke Friday sounded like someone who wanted to open up before the virus is under control. And the world has discovered the hard way that it’s not how it works.

Bruce Arthur is a Toronto-based columnist for the Star. Follow him on Twitter:

Doug Ford’s pandemic pledge to hire thousands of nursing-home workers criticized as short on details

Where’s the beef?

One day after Premier Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives unveiled a record $187 billion budget, critics are demanding details on boosting the level of care in nursing homes in the wake of COVID-19.

Days before the budget was unveiled on Thursday, Ford pledged to hire thousands of nurses and personal support workers to ensure four hours of hands-on care for residents up from two hours and 45 minutes.

But that promise, which is estimated to cost $1.6 billion a year, was not specifically spelled out in the budget, which added $7.5 billion in new funding to fight the pandemic that has killed some 3,200 Ontarians since March, two-thirds of them in nursing homes.

“It’s like Doug Ford is throwing in the towel on fighting COVID-19 in nursing homes,” NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Friday.

“He’s telling seniors and long-term-care staff — the heroes still there, working night and day — that they’re on their own now in the battle against COVID-19. Help is not on the way,” said Horwath.

“Doug Ford’s budget doesn’t take any new actions to make everyday people safer, or healthier, especially in long-term care.”

Morgan Hoffarth, president of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO) expressed concern that the government isn’t guaranteeing four hours of care until 2024-25.

“There is no excuse for postponing the urgently needed staffing increase in the province’s nursing homes,” said Hoffarth, adding the government’s “timetable to act on this promise will only lead to more preventable deaths.”

“We can’t — and shouldn’t have to — wait more than four years to meet minimum safety standards for this province’s most vulnerable seniors,” said Hoffarth.

Donna Duncan, CEO of the Ontario Long Term Care Association, which represents 70 per cent of the province’s nursing homes, said “the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated long-standing issues in long-term care.”

Duncan praised the government for “committing to increase direct care to an average of four hours for long-term-care residents.”

“We look forward to working with them to create a workforce with thousands more skilled health-care workers to serve our seniors,” she said.

Ford, for his part, said the Tories are “totally committed to make sure that we have four hours of care.”

Finance Minister Rod Phillips emphasized “the funding is and will be available for four hours of care in long-term care.”

“We’ll be getting the staffing strategy in December,” said Phillips, adding he is in discussions with Ottawa to get more people to come to Ontario to fill the new caregiver jobs.

“We’ve started the conversation about the important role that some targeted immigration can play. We’re talking about tens of thousands of people that need to be trained and we’ll be setting metrics,” he said.

“So we shouldn’t underestimate the complexity of this, but … the money will be there to pay for it and this will make so much difference.”

Warren (Smokey) Thomas, president of the Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union, said Thursday’s budget was the first since former NDP premier Bob Rae was in power “that acknowledges public services are the great equalizer, and that doesn’t cast public sector workers as villains.”

“It’s clear that during the pandemic, this government has come to recognize the true value of strong public services. Front-line workers are indeed heroes,” said Thomas, hailing the “excellent commitment” to hire long-term-care workers.

The government’s long-term-care commission last month issued an interim recommendation urging the four-hour standard of care.

Some 2,900 nursing-home workers have caught COVID-19 and eight have died, which has made recruiting staff challenging. The Tories have temporarily increased wages for caregivers by $3 an hour as an incentive to stay.

Robert Benzie is the Star’s Queen’s Park bureau chief and a reporter covering Ontario politics. Follow him on Twitter:

New Tecumseth faces 3 more minister’s zoning order requests for large-scale projects in Alliston, Tottenham

More developers are lining up to ask the Town of New Tecumseth to support their plans to request a Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) to approve large-scale developments in Alliston and Tottenham.

The details of the requests, which the town has not made public yet, relate to Totten Investment Inc.’s Coventry Park Neighbourhood Plan and Rock Garden Estates Inc. Hawthorne Glen for Tottenham, and San Marco in Lamis Ltd.’s proposal for Huntington Woods in Alliston. All of the proposed developments are located outside the settlement area boundaries for both communities.

. The documents submitted to the town state the development would include a range of housing types, including affordable options, and also a 200-bed-long-term-care facility.

The Rock Garden Estates is proposed to be built at a 70-hectare property located on the north side of the 5th Line, west of Tottenham Road. . The plan says the property would be used for employment uses and commercial uses along the 5th Line.

The proposal also says two manufacturing companies have expressed interest in expanding their operations at the property, which would bring almost 2,000 “good paying” jobs to the area.

The north end of the property toward the 6th Line would be used for residential and community uses, including “expanded natural areas” and also for “alternative forms” of housing.

The Huntington Woods proposal at , is described as a residential community designed for seniors of all stages in life, including those requiring long-term care. The plan includes 336 residential units, including single and semi-detached homes, along with townhomes, plus a 120-bed long-term-care facility and community centre.

The MZO is a tool at the disposal of the province that allows the minister of municipal affairs and housing to designate land uses, which in turn lets developers bypass the normal planning approval process at the municipal level. While MZOs used to be reserved for extraordinary cases, the Ford government has been using them more frequently in the past two years. Since early October, the province has issued them 26 times.

An MZO removes the requirement for any public consultation, along with the possibility of appealing the land use designation at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).

While the minister of municipal affairs and housing is the one who ultimately approves MZOs, the ministry told Simcoe.com it doesn’t consider requests for approval unless they have the full backing of the municipal council.

Councillors will be asked to provide comments on the three requests at an upcoming committee of the whole meeting.

Simcoe.com asked New Tecumseth Mayor Rick Milne to explain how he thinks the town should deal with the influx of MZOs, and any others that might be coming.

“We will deal with each one separately, sending it to staff to make a report when all information has been gathered, and send it back to council to make a decision,” he said.

These requests follow on the heels of FLATO’s MZO request for a 995-unit development outside Beeton’s settlement boundary that proposes to provide attainable housing for seniors.

Council voted 7-3 in favour of the proposal at a special meeting held Oct. 19, but council is expected to discuss the issue again at the Nov. 4 meeting to finalize a list of conditions the town wants to include in its letter of support to the province.